In favor of evolution is a vast amount of physical evidence from many different scientific areas including physics, astronomy, chemistry, geology, biochemistry, molecular biology, paleontology and so forth.
In favor of creationism, there is no physical evidence of any creator.
nahcm Said:
Well first you have to consider the fact that both creation and evolution stem from religion.
Evolution – you have to accept (have blind faith) the concept of evolutionism in order to accept what evolutionist support as claims that provide evidence of such a radical concept.
Creation Science – you have to accept that their is a creator, and that science along with technological advances support this more than its counterpart.
Kathryn P Said:
Look at your mother, father and any siblings you may have.
Do you look like any of them? Which ones? Do you have your mother’s hair and your father’s chin? This is evolution.
change that comes with generations.
astrolopithicus africanus was somewhere between ape and man. Just because all apes did not turn into man does not disallow the possibility that SOME races of ape did in fact change and turn into man.
Things change. People are not the same as they were 40 years ago, and 40 years from now they will be different again.
Evolution is nothing more than the mixtures of chromasomes and genes to get an end result slightly different than the originators.
******
Forgot creationism?
If you believe in the Bible, then that’s it. Otherwise, there is no evidence that poof we started being people.
murph Said:
Evolution :
1) The fact that all living organisms contain genetic material (DNA, RNA)
2) The similar structures of analgous enzymes in different organisms. Particularly, enzymes of more complex organisms contain subunits that are nearly, if not, identical to the same-functioned enzymes in less complex organisms.
3) The fact that archeological data shows that organisms were less complex long ago, and the fact that increased complexity of systems generally corresponds to a more efficient system – i.e. higher efficiency = better chance of survival, less chance of extinction due to competition.
Creationism:
I feel that this perspective – i.e. a ‘master plan’ – justifies the existance of highly complicated and complex systems that modern science is only beginning to describe and understand. Open up any high-level biology textbook – most cellular processes are vaguely understood to say the least.
milton b Said:
On the evolution side there is direct evidence in the form of species that are similar (lions and tigers), species with related biochemistry and there is now DNA evidence. On the creationism side there is the Bible.
In favor of evolution is a vast amount of physical evidence from many different scientific areas including physics, astronomy, chemistry, geology, biochemistry, molecular biology, paleontology and so forth.
In favor of creationism, there is no physical evidence of any creator.
Well first you have to consider the fact that both creation and evolution stem from religion.
Evolution – you have to accept (have blind faith) the concept of evolutionism in order to accept what evolutionist support as claims that provide evidence of such a radical concept.
Creation Science – you have to accept that their is a creator, and that science along with technological advances support this more than its counterpart.
Look at your mother, father and any siblings you may have.
Do you look like any of them? Which ones? Do you have your mother’s hair and your father’s chin? This is evolution.
change that comes with generations.
astrolopithicus africanus was somewhere between ape and man. Just because all apes did not turn into man does not disallow the possibility that SOME races of ape did in fact change and turn into man.
Things change. People are not the same as they were 40 years ago, and 40 years from now they will be different again.
Evolution is nothing more than the mixtures of chromasomes and genes to get an end result slightly different than the originators.
******
Forgot creationism?
If you believe in the Bible, then that’s it. Otherwise, there is no evidence that poof we started being people.
Evolution :
1) The fact that all living organisms contain genetic material (DNA, RNA)
2) The similar structures of analgous enzymes in different organisms. Particularly, enzymes of more complex organisms contain subunits that are nearly, if not, identical to the same-functioned enzymes in less complex organisms.
3) The fact that archeological data shows that organisms were less complex long ago, and the fact that increased complexity of systems generally corresponds to a more efficient system – i.e. higher efficiency = better chance of survival, less chance of extinction due to competition.
Creationism:
I feel that this perspective – i.e. a ‘master plan’ – justifies the existance of highly complicated and complex systems that modern science is only beginning to describe and understand. Open up any high-level biology textbook – most cellular processes are vaguely understood to say the least.
On the evolution side there is direct evidence in the form of species that are similar (lions and tigers), species with related biochemistry and there is now DNA evidence. On the creationism side there is the Bible.